In my opinion using new forms of communication, particularly applying new ways of written communication (shortened forms, abbreviations, symbols (emoticons), etc) is applicable as long as its effectiveness remains. I consider relevant and indisputable the fact of language evolution and how it is functional through users, but the point is how this evolution generates principles and conventions which are not comprehensive to all of the receptors. I think this effect may exclude individuals, (not all of us understand these new meanings or grammar so we may feel we do not belong to specific communities). As language teachers, we should be aware of the difference of the nature of oral and written forms and how they should be developed; when talking and listening to someone there is always the chance to reformulate, complement, give explanations and details to make ideas clear. Additionally body language, gestures, tone of voice, etc contribute to clarify messages. On the contrary written communication does not have that possibility; the author of the writings is not available to facilitate interpretation there is not any assistance for understanding just the printed words. That is why this type of communication should be precise and consequently it should be taught this way if possible (according to students’ levels).
As language teachers we should develop certain accuracy level in writing. I think formative feedback is a key element to reach this goal, when teachers guide individual writing process based on learners’ skills and tools given it is possible to expect some precision.
No comments:
Post a Comment